Menu

Showing posts with label Philosophy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philosophy. Show all posts

General view and impression of death by philosophers

Death is the reality of life and every living thing have to taste the death. People can deny the God and no one can deny the death. In this post we will study different views of philosophers on death. 

  1. The Epicureans: The followers of the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus. Death is nothing to Epicureans. According to them, we fear death because of the belief that the death is painful and that the soul may have to suffer in an afterlife, but both beliefs are not true. Death is not painful it is a painless loss of the consciousness it is just like the falling asleep and therefore nothing to be feared. 

  2. The Stoics: Seneca(4BCE-65CE), a Roman follower of Stoicism said that there is no need to fear death. To overcome this fear, we should think of it in a proper manner. Death reminds us that we are part of the nature and we must accept this truth.

     
  3. Prophet Muhammad: Islamic prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him)(570-632 CE) taught that death is a natural part of life, urging believers to prepare for the afterlife through righteous deeds and adherence to moral principles. He emphasized hope in God's mercy, encouraging remembrance of death as a means of spiritual reflection and motivation for leading a virtuous life. 

  4. Spinoza: A Dutch philosopher Benedict de Spinoza(1632-1677), wrote, a fearful an thinks of nothing less than of death, and his wisdom is not a meditation upon death but upon life.

I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, religion, philosophy, as a cause for withdrawing from a friend

I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, religion, philosophy, as a cause for withdrawing from a friend. - Thomas Jefferson
I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, religion, philosophy, as a cause for withdrawing from a friend. - Thomas Jefferson
I never considered a difference of opinion in politics, religion, philosophy, as a cause for withdrawing from a friend. - Thomas Jefferson

 

What is anthropology?

Anthropology is the study of aspects of humans within past and present societies and human evaluation. The Person who study anthropology is called anthropologist.

The drops of rain make a hole in the stone, not by violence, but by oft falling

The drops of rain make a hole in the stone, not by violence, but by oft falling.
The drops of rain make a hole in the stone, not by violence, but by oft falling. | Titus Lucretius 

Plato | A Greek Philosopher

Plato is the well-known Greek Philosopher and student of Socrates. Socrates considered that unexamined life is not worth living and argues that virtue is knowledge. Plato has influenced by Socrates in pursuit of knowledge against sophists. He influenced the western philosophy than any philosopher. Plato’s interests were broad, including the study of knowledge, mathematics, ultimate reality, ethics, and politics. He thought that ultimate reality of things was given by their ‘forms.’ For Plato, the real world is unchanging, eternal, and beyond our senses. We can understand reality though intellectual study. The aim of philosophy is to get away from the world of sense and desire to the higher realm of existence of the Forms. The form of an object is its essence, and is what makes it what it is. Examples of forms include beauty, justice, numbers, and shapes. We can know about ultimate reality (the world of forms) through the use of our intellect.

Our senses do not tell us much about ultimate reality. For Plato, mathematics is the paradigm of knowledge, since it is done through intellectual reasoning independent of the apparent world around us, and tells us eternal unchanging truths. In The Republic Plato says that the soul has three parts, corresponding to reason, emotion, and desire. He also thinks that the soul (or at least part of it) is immortal, and can be reincarnated. Plato thinks that only those who understand the nature of goodness are fit to rule in society. Most people do not understand goodness. The rulers should try to maximize the happiness of society, by imposing strict censorship of ideas and of artistic expression. He saw no connection between happiness and individual liberty. He wants to show that there is absolute truth, and absolute right and wrong, and that human beings are not the measure of all things.

Fallibilism in philosophy

Fallibilism is that some parts of accepted knowledge claims could be wrong or at least flawed. In contrast, a fallibilist is not so quick to discount the possibility of having knowledge. For the fallibilist, the lack of absolute certainty does not undermine our ability to know the truth of some particular claims. Fallibists are willing to accept a justified claim as true until it is shown to be false. 

This idea is not as essential as some found in philosophy, since often human knowledge is founded on observed interactions that could be interpreted incorrectly. Numerous times our understanding of the world is found to be fallible, not perfect, and we discover mistakes after new empirical observations are made. The response of the scientific community in that case is to revise the knowledge claim, not to deny the possibility of knowing anything for sure. 

Two philosophers have contributed significantly to the philosophical understanding of fallibilism. 

  1. Charles Sanders Peirce was the first to say that our knowledge about science is naturally fallible. This is not to say that we should deny its validity, but at least be aware of its shortcomings.
  2. Willard Van Orman Quine took what Peirce said a little further. He not only applied fallibilism to science, but to any analytic statement as well. Since our statements are founded on a fallible science, then the natural laws which the statements express are also fallible.

Why Michael H. Hart keep Prophet Muhammad on top of most influencial person in history in his book The 100?

MUHAMMAD 570-632 

My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world's most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular levels.
Of humble origins, Muhammad founded and promulgated one of the world's great religions, and became an immensely effective political leader. Today, thirteen centuries after his death, his influence is still powerful and pervasive.

The majority of the persons in this book had the advantage of being born and raised in centers of civilization, highly cultured or politically pivotal nations. Muhammad, however, was born in the year 570, in the city of Mecca, in southern Arabia, at that time a backward area of the world, far from the centers of trade, art, and learning. Orphaned at age six, he was reared in modest surroundings. Islamic tradition tells us that he was illiterate. His economic position improved when, at age twenty-five, he married a wealthy widow. Nevertheless, as he approached forty, there was little outward indication that he was a remarkable person.

Most Arabs at that time were pagans, who believed in many gods. There were, however, in Mecca, a small number of Jews and Christians; it was from them no doubt that Muhammad first learned of a single, omnipotent God who ruled the entire universe. When he was forty years old, Muhammad became convinced that this one true God (Allah) was speaking to him, and had chosen him to spread the true faith.

For three years, Muhammad preached only to close friends and associates. Then, about 613, he began preaching in public. As he slowly gained converts, the Meccan authorities came to consider him a dangerous nuisance. In 622, fearing for his safety, Muhammad fled to Medina (a city some 200 miles north of Mecca), where he had been offered a position of considerable political power.

This flight, called the Hegira, was the turning point of the Prophet's life. In Mecca, he had had few followers. In Medina, he had many more, and he soon acquired an influence that made him a virtual dictator. During the next few years, while Muhammad s following grew rapidly, a series of battles were fought between Medina and Mecca. This was ended in 630 with Muhammad's triumphant return to Mecca as conqueror. The remaining two and one-half years of his life witnessed the rapid conversion of the Arab tribes to the new religion. When Muhammad died, in 632, he was the effective ruler of all of southern Arabia.

The Bedouin tribesmen of Arabia had a reputation as fierce warriors. But their number was small; and plagued by disunity and internecine warfare, they had been no match for the larger armies of the kingdoms in the settled agricultural areas to the north. However, unified by Muhammad for the first time in history, and inspired by their fervent belief in the one true God, these small Arab armies now embarked upon one of the most astonishing series of conquests in human history. To the northeast of Arabia lay the large Neo-Persian Empire of the Sassanids; to the northwest lay the Byzantine, or Eastern Roman Empire, centered in Constantinople. Numerically, the Arabs were no match for their opponents. On the field of battle, though, the inspired Arabs rapidly conquered all of Mesopotamia, Syria, and Palestine. By 642, Egypt had been wrested from the Byzantine Empire, while the Persian armies had been crushed at the key battles of Qadisiya in 637, and Nehavend in 642.

But even these enormous conquests-which were made under the leadership of Muhammad's close friends and immediate successors, Abu Bakr and 'Umar ibn al-Khattab -did not mark the end of the Arab advance. By 711, the Arab armies had swept completely across North Africa to the Atlantic Ocean There they turned north and, crossing the Strait of Gibraltar, overwhelmed the Visigothic kingdom in Spain.

For a while, it must have seemed that the Moslems would overwhelm all of Christian Europe. However, in 732, at the famous Battle of Tours, a Moslem army, which had advanced into the center of France, was at last defeated by the Franks. Nevertheless, in a scant century of fighting, these Bedouin tribesmen, inspired by the word of the Prophet, had carved out an empire stretching from the borders of India to the Atlantic Ocean-the largest empire that the world had yet seen. And everywhere that the armies conquered, large-scale conversion to the new faith eventually followed.

Now, not all of these conquests proved permanent. The Persians, though they have remained faithful to the religion of the Prophet, have since regained their independence from the Arabs. And in Spain, more than seven centuries of warfare 5 finally resulted in the Christians reconquering the entire peninsula. However, Mesopotamia and Egypt, the two cradles of ancient civilization, have remained Arab, as has the entire coast of North Africa. The new religion, of course, continued to spread, in the intervening centuries, far beyond the borders of the original Moslem conquests. Currently it has tens of millions of adherents in Africa and Central Asia and even more in Pakistan and northern India, and in Indonesia. In Indonesia, the new faith has been a unifying factor. In the Indian subcontinent, however, the conflict between Moslems and Hindus is still a major obstacle to unity.

How, then, is one to assess the overall impact of Muhammad on human history? Like all religions, Islam exerts an enormous influence upon the lives of its followers. It is for this reason that the founders of the world's great religions all figure prominently in this book . Since there are roughly twice as many Christians as Moslems (Muslim) in the world, it may initially seem strange that Muhammad has been ranked higher than Jesus. There are two principal reasons for that decision. First, Muhammad played a far more important role in the development of Islam than Jesus did in the development of Christianity. Although Jesus was responsible for the main ethical and moral precepts of Christianity (insofar as these differed from Judaism), St. Paul was the main developer of Christian theology, its principal proselytizer, and the author of a large portion of the New Testament.

Muhammad, however, was responsible for both the theology of Islam and its main ethical and moral principles. In addition, he played the key role in proselytizing the new faith, and in establishing the religious practices of Islam. Moreover, he is the author of the Moslem holy scriptures, the Koran, a collection of certain of Muhammad's insights that he believed had been directly revealed to him by Allah. Most of these utterances were copied more or less faithfully during Muhammad's lifetime and were collected together in authoritative form not long after his death. The Koran therefore, closely represents Muhammad's ideas and teachings and to a considerable extent his exact words. No such detailed compilation of the teachings of Christ has survived. Since the Koran is at least as important to Moslems as the Bible is to Christians, the influence of Muhammed through the medium of the Koran has been enormous It is probable that the relative influence of Muhammad on Islam has been larger than the combined influence of Jesus Christ and St. Paul on Christianity. On the purely religious level, then, it seems likely that Muhammad has been as influential in human history as Jesus.

Furthermore, Muhammad (unlike Jesus) was a secular as well as a religious leader. In fact, as the driving force behind the Arab conquests, he may well rank as the most influential political leader of all time.

Of many important historical events, one might say that they were inevitable and would have occurred even without the particular political leader who guided them. For example, the South American colonies would probably have won their independence from Spain even if Simon Bolivar had never lived. But this cannot be said of the Arab conquests. Nothing similar had occurred before Muhammad, and there is no reason to believe that the conquests would have been achieved without him. The only comparable conquests in human history are those of the Mongols in the thirteenth century, which were primarily due to the influence of Genghis Khan. These conquests, however, though more extensive than those of the Arabs, did not prove permanent, and today the only areas occupied by the Mongols are those that they held prior to the time of Genghis Khan.

It is far different with the conquests of the Arabs. From Iraq to Morocco, there extends a whole chain of Arab nations united not merely by their faith in Islam, but also by their Arabic language, history, and culture. The centrality of the Koran in the Moslem religion and the fact that it is written in Arabic have probably prevented the Arab language from breaking up into mutually unintelligible dialects, which might otherwise have occurred in the intervening thirteen centuries. Differences and divisions between these Arab states exist, of course, and they are considerable, but the partial disunity should not blind us to the important elements of unity that have continued to exist. For instance, neither Iran nor Indonesia, both oil-producing states and both Islamic in religion, joined in the oil embargo of the winter of 1973-74. It is no coincidence that all of the Arab states, and only the Arab states, participated in the embargo.

We see, then, that the Arab conquests of the seventh century have continued to play an important role in human history, down to the present day. It is this unparalleled combination of secular and religious influence which I feel entitles Muhammad to be considered the most influential single figure in human history.


References:

Falsafa-e-Khudi | اقبال کا فلسفہ خودی

اقبال کا فلسفہ خودی


ہر انسان کی زندگی میں ایک دور ایسا ضرور آتا ہے جب اس کے دل میں ایک قسم کی غیر شعوری خلش پیدا ہوجاتی ہے ایک خلا پیدا ہو جاتی ہے- بہت سے سوالات پیدا ہو جاتے ہیں اور تسلی بخش  جواب نہ پا کر کبھی خاموش ہو جاتے ہیں، کبھی زندگی کو تار تار کر جھنجوڑ ڈالتے ہیں- -ان سوالات کی شدّت کسی کے یہاں کم ہوتی ہے کسی کے یہاں زیادہ - کوئی انسان اس سے آسانی سے نجات پا لیتا ہیں ور کوئی زندگی بھر ان سے دامن نہی چھوڑا سکتا-
میری زندگی مے بھی ایک ایسا دور آیا- بیسیوں سوالات دل مے پیدا ہو گئے- اس کائنات کا بنانے والا کون ہے؟ کائنات کیوں بنائی گئی؟ یہ حقیقت ہے یا محض نظر کا دھوکا؟ کائنات مے انسان کی کیا حشیت ہیں؟ انسان اپنے اعمال مے مختا رہے یا مجبور؟ اگر انسان نائب خدا ہے تو اسے گمراہ کرنے کے لئے شیطان کو پیدا کیوں کیا گیا ؟ جنّت ور دوزخ کیا ہے؟ نیکی ور بدی کے کیا معنی ہے؟ بعد ازمرگ کوئی زندگی ہوگی یا نہی ہوگی؟ اگر ہوگی تو اس کی نوعیت کیا ہوگی؟ خالق اور مخلوق کا کیا تعلّق ہے؟ وغیرہ - وغیرہ 

لیکن ایک چیز تو یقینی واقعی ہے جس مے شک قطعی نا ممکن ہے - اور وہ خود میرا شک کرنا، سوچنا اور فکر کرنا ہے- یہ تو ایک متضاد بات ہوگی کے جو چیز سوچی جا رہی ہے وہ سوچنے کی حالت مے موجود ہی نا ہو- سوچنے نا شک کرنے کے لئے ایک سوچنے والی، شک کرنے والی ذات ک اھونا ضروری ہے- شک کرنے کے معنی سوچنے اور سوچنے کے معنی ہونے کے ہیں- میں سوچتا ہوں اس لئے میں ہوں- میرے اس سوچنے سے یا شابت ہوتا ہے کے اور کچھ موجود ہو یا نا ہو میری خودی، میری ذات کا وجود تو قطان ہے- 


Philosophy of Iqbal, Allama Iqbal, Muhammad Iqbal, Khudi, Philosophy of Khudi.

Who is God?

According to Islam:

He is Allah, [who is] One. Allah, the Eternal Refuge. He neither begets nor is born, nor is there to Him any equivalent. [Quran 112]

When Allah wants to create or do anything he just says Be:

His command is only when He intends a thing that He says to it, "Be," and it is. [Quran 36:82]



According to Christianity:


God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth. [John 14:6]. The Rock, his work is perfect, for all his ways are justice. A God of faithfulness and without iniquity, just and upright is he. [Deuteronomy 32:4]

According to Jews:


According to Hinduism:

You at your birth are Varuna, O Agni. When you are kindled, you are Mitra. In you, O son of strength, all Gods are centered. You are Indra to the mortal who brings oblation. You are Aryaman, when you are regarded as having the mysterious names of maidens, O Self-sustainer. [Rigveda 5.3.1-2]

According to Buddhism:



If you have any valid reference for this article or if you think I am missing something here, you can let me know I will try to update the article.


References:



World has been defeated by few people

WORLD AND RULERS

How this world has been defeated by few people. there are only very few people who are wise and able to read the books and facts, if I will give a percentage then it could be the 19% of the world population, rest 81 percent of the world population are Sheep. They don't want to read they want to listen summary only. They curious to listen thousand pages of story in a single page; that's why media and other story tellers are more success in this world because 81 percent of world population standing in that queue and waiting for the story to get summarize. Reading power is the capacity which enhance your thinking skill,if you read the complete story then you can put your own thought into it and analyse the things by your own way but when you listen to a summary it means that person will summarize the story by his own way and told you only those part which he/she think okay and in favor or against him or his ideology and the methodology. 

If we talk about the philosophy and the Philosopher's even in the current world they used to read thousands of the books and those reading helps that persons to become a philosopher by acquiring the knowledge of previous people; which give power to analyse, fight and deal with the situation and provide his own view or suggestion on those issues and talk. Why every organisation wants to hire a experience person? because they have experience to deal with situation, and from their previous experience they know how I handled that situation last and in future if this will come again then I can easily resolve that. But in today's world most of the people don't want to read since they don't have the time to read they are very busy with their electronic gadgets and they are very busy with there social network profiles where mostly people discuss rubbish.

So before reaching to any conclusion I recommend you people not solution of blindly follow what others are saying or telling to you go ahead read some related article for the content use your mind and analyse the thing since you are the most precious honour thing if you take of this universe.

Dialectical method by Plato

Dialectical method first used by #Plato. This is a method to;
1. Understand the truth of society.
2. Say the truth to society.
3. Represent the truth to society.


Philosophy of Plato about truth and society.

#Philosophy #Dialectical 

What is peace?

A definition of peace by Pandit Nehru.

Peace is not a relationship of nations. It is a condition of mind brought about by a serenity of soul. Peace is not merely the absence of war. It is also a state of mind. Lasting peace can come only to peaceful people.    -  First Prime Minister of Independent India, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru

Philosophers

The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. - Karl Marx